Small Grants

In November 2015, new legislation came into effect that recognised control and coercion of another as a criminal offence. In Cheshire, where domestic abuse interviews make up the majority of the Interview Custody Unit’s (ICU) workload, officers are now conducting many interviews with a view of prosecuting for control and coercion. One difficulty they experience when conducting these interviews is that the suspects offer compelling and believable accounts of their circumstances. For example, in line with their offending, many suspects are proficient manipulators. Interviewers become convinced of their innocence, even when subsequent evidence leads to a successful prosecution.

The possibility that interviewers are being misled by manipulative behaviours needs to be addressed urgently. Interview teams that do not recognise the suspect’s coercion may put the victim through further, challenging questioning, and they may ultimately release a guilty suspect. This will only exacerbate the current reluctance of victims to come forward. It is thus essential that research be carried out to raise awareness of the kinds of manipulations used by offenders in control and coercion cases. Translated into training, this knowledge will allow interviewers to become more adept at identifying manipulative behaviours. It may also provide them with communication strategies to counter and overcome the manipulative behaviours of suspects, thereby improving their efficiency.

contact Julie Jackson

The policing of the possession and supply of illicit drugs takes up significant amounts of police time. The impact of such policing activity can also be profound for the offenders involved (many of whom have multiple vulnerabilities) and, consequently, for relations with the police more broadly. Despite the salience of such issues in policy and media debates, and despite growing interest among a number of police forces in piloting new approaches to these issues, this is all but virgin territory for academic research.

There are two main aims of this project: first, it will describe and analyse the nature and extent of work undertaken in enforcing the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971) (MDA) in NYP. This will represent the first detailed study of its kind. It will draw on the initial analyses already being undertaken by the NYP Strategic Intelligence Team for the Force’s Strategic Assessment. Staff from this unit will work closely with researchers at York and Leeds to drill down into these data and produce detailed analyses of pathways through the CJS for all offences under the MDA: from initial contact through to conviction/disposal. This statistical picture will then be developed by semi-structured interviews undertaken with police officers at all levels of seniority to develop a rich and nuanced understanding of frontline and strategic perceptions concerning the policing of drug offences. The second aim is to draw on this analysis, along with local evaluation evidence and experience from around the country, to explore different models of enforcing the MDA. 

contact Dr Stuart Lister

This project seeks to understand police officers’ current responses to coercive control, and to consider how existing knowledge can be used to maximise the effectiveness of their future responses. It is increasingly recognised that physical violence is just one of the many techniques that may be used to gain greater power and control within intimate relationships (Dobash & Dobash, 1992; Stark, 2007; Johnson, 2008). Other behaviours could include verbal abuse, humiliation, threats, isolation, dominance, economic abuse and coercive control. Although a more multifaceted conceptualisation of domestic abuse is evident in theory and increasingly policy, scholars have criticised legal and criminal justice responses for not adequately recognising the full spectrum of abusive behaviours, such as coercive control (Dutton and Goodman, 2005; Stark, 2007). With this in mind, this project proposal emphasises the importance of recognising the harm and long-term impact that non-physical methods of abuse, such as coercive control, can have on victims.

contact Dr Charlotte Barlow

At the recent N8 PRP Policing Innovation Forum in Manchester (08/11/16) Zoe Billingham of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary identified the pressing need for research to be conducted into the impact of Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) in incidents of domestic abuse. This proposed study responds to this agenda by bringing together a consortia of two N8 Police Forces and an N8 University, to work collaboratively to identify policy and practice lessons in the use of this potentially 'transformative' technology (Soboroff, 2014) and therin help police to better protect from harm those citizens who are vulnerable on account of their domestic circumstances. This study has been co-designed and emerged directly from discussions between the collaborating forces held in the light of the recent N8 PRP Innovation Forum on domestic abuse. The specific aims of the study are to:

• Identify the challenges and opportunities of ensuring that BWCs are used in ways that increase the effectiveness and efficiency of police response to domestic abuse incidents;
• Examine the impacts of BWC on how incidents of domestic abuse are dealt with (i.e. 'disposed of') within the criminal justice process.

contact Dr Stuart Lister

Recent HMIC (2014, 2015) reports provide further indications of the limitations of the police service response to victims of domestic violence (DV). The scale of DV – generating around 1 million calls for assistance per year, and accounting for 10 per cent of recorded crimes – is daunting. Nationally, 80 women die at the hands of their abusers each year in the UK (Kelly and Westmarland, 2015). It might appear that police sometimes lag behind in terms of policy developments (such as the concept of ‘coercive control’). Nonetheless, the HMIC reports also indicate considerable innovation in policy and practice. Within the N8 area alone, police services have (among other things) created specialist posts and new training packages; piloted Domestic Violence Protection Orders; led on Domestic Violence Disclosures; and introduced multi agency teams, school liaison officers, and victim advocates.

In recognition of the key realist principle that evaluation needs to concentrate on mechanisms of change, as well as outcomes, the central idea of this project is for academics and police officers and staff to work collaboratively to identify areas in which innovation has been successful, and to develop deeper and richer understanding of the enabling circumstances and how these might build capacity in other police services. Indeed, a central objective of the project will be to help transfer innovative practice around DV as well as, more broadly, to provide police and academic researchers with greater understanding of the mechanisms and contexts shaping successful changes in operational practice.

contact Professor Mike Rowe

Cryptocurrency has increasingly become a common method of value exchange in a number of types of criminal activity such as Ransomware cases for example, where victims of extortion included police forces. Significantly, in 2014, the Greater Manchester Police Economic Crime Unit investigated a case in which several million pounds of Bitcoin were stolen from an international victim by a locally based Manchester criminal. Following a complex investigation the victim refused to provide an evidential statement to the police, stating that he would bear the loss of 3 million dollars rather than lose his reputation in the cryptocurrency community. The Crown Prosecution decided that there was not enough evidence to pursue a prosecution and the case was dropped. Recently, Operation Viscount highlighted the fact that the police alone cannot successfully investigate cases involving cryptocurrencies.

The objective of this research is therefore to bring together interdisciplinerary experts from national and local law enforcement, academia, the Crown Prosecution Service, private industry and the financial sector in order to explore and comment upon the various challenges that cryptocurrecncies, such as Bitcoins, create for the police.

contact Phil Larratt or Professor David Wall

The main aim of the collaboration is to establish a profile of human trafficking incidents and offences known to GMP since the implementation of the Modern Slavery Coordination Unit (MSCU) in March 2015, Greater Manchester Police has been collating a database of such incidents and offences since this time.

The database includes details of over 250 cases, including those that were reported to the National Referral Mechanism, and those that were reported to or detected by the police. Many such offences are facilitated to some degree online, via websites and social media, and the database has some relevant details that can be extracted about the cyber components of such crimes. Other information contained in the database includes: the nationalities of victims and offenders; the types of offences committed; the charges brought; the locations of the activity and the success or otherwise of convictions; and the progress made with the investigation. As it stands, GMP and the multiagency Challenger Team (including Immigration, UK Border Force, Gangmasters Licensing Authority, and local authority professionals) have no capacity to include all information in the database and to perform a thoroughgoing analysis of it. This analysis is much needed, however, for it can reveal how the new law is working, where policing efforts are successful, as well as something of those cases,victims and offenders that are not so readily resolved under the Modern Slavery Act.

contact Professor David Gadd

This project will gain insight into the impact on current policing practice of novel Psychoactive Substance (NPS) use. 

The work will have two linked strands: first we will explore with a range of police staff the impact that the fast changing culture of NPS use has on their day-to-day work as first responders in the criminal justice system; we will also explore with NPS users the sourcing and purchasing, including on-line availability, as well as immediate behavioural impacts and wider consequences of NPS use. As well as offering an insight into risks and harmful behaviours connected with NPS use, we will explore perceptions about the legality and impending illegality of NPS use, its relationship with wider substance use (classified drugs and alcohol), and how police custody suite interactions are viewed and managed by a range of police staff and detainees.

contact Professor Eileen Kaner